So one could argue that LAION technically has nothing to take down, even if asked to, but Kneschke believes that LAION has not shielded itself from liability. The reason is that LAION says it does not host the images themselves, but rather provides the URLs where these images can be downloaded.
#Adguard adblock dns for free
The data that LAION parsed to find image-text pairs comes from Common Crawl, another non-profit that scrapes the web every month and provides petabytes of data for free to the public.Īs we discussed in one of our previous articles, it might be hard to hold LAION liable for copyright infringement. These datasets, the largest of which contains 5.8 billion filtered image-text pairs, have been used to train prominent text-to-image and video-generating models, including Stable Diffusion, Midjorney and Google’s Imagen. LAION is a German non-profit that is best known for releasing several huge datasets of images and captions. LAION and its role in the generative AI revolutionīefore we go deeper into the case, a couple of words need to be said about LAION (Large-scale Artificial Intelligence Open Network), which has been instrumental in the ongoing generative AI craze. His case raises questions: Is copyright protection enforceable at all in the age of AI? And is AI training, as it exists now, intrinsically unethical? As we try to answer these questions, let’s take a closer look at how Kneschke has challenged one of the pillars of the generative AI industry: its ability to train AI models on billions of images, many of them copyrighted, for free. Not only did LAION refuse, but it also said he must pay for making “unjustified” copyright claims.
Kneschke said he asked LAION - a non-profit that provides training materials for machine learning research - to remove his photos from its dataset. Well, it’s not that simple, as the case of Robert Kneschke, a German stock photographer, shows. What would you do if you found out that the photos that you’d taken were being used to train AI without your consent? You might think that you have the right to ask the organization that is using them to stop and delete them.
0 kommentar(er)
